Starter Writing skill
Write a request for proposal
Draft a fair request for proposal with comparable responses and explicit evaluation rules.
Procedure
- Confirm procurement route, authority, timetable, communications channel, and confidentiality rules.
- Summarize the outcome, context, users, current state, scope, and exclusions.
- Include testable requirements, service expectations, transition needs, data handling, and exit obligations.
- Ask suppliers to state assumptions, dependencies, exceptions, evidence, pricing, and total lifecycle cost.
- Publish the evaluation criteria, weighting, mandatory gates, and decision process.
- Define question, amendment, submission, presentation, clarification, and award dates.
- Make response instructions structured enough for like-for-like comparison.
- Review for vendor bias, unnecessary barriers, ambiguity, and disclosure risk before release.
Guardrails
- Do not promise award, volume, exclusivity, or contract terms without authority.
- Use approved legal and procurement language rather than inventing binding terms.
- Give material clarifications to all eligible bidders through the same controlled channel.
--- name: write-a-request-for-proposal category: write description: Draft a fair request for proposal with comparable responses and explicit evaluation rules. Use when an organization is inviting suppliers to propose a consequential product or service. --- # write-a-request-for-proposal ## Procedure 1. Confirm procurement route, authority, timetable, communications channel, and confidentiality rules. 2. Summarize the outcome, context, users, current state, scope, and exclusions. 3. Include testable requirements, service expectations, transition needs, data handling, and exit obligations. 4. Ask suppliers to state assumptions, dependencies, exceptions, evidence, pricing, and total lifecycle cost. 5. Publish the evaluation criteria, weighting, mandatory gates, and decision process. 6. Define question, amendment, submission, presentation, clarification, and award dates. 7. Make response instructions structured enough for like-for-like comparison. 8. Review for vendor bias, unnecessary barriers, ambiguity, and disclosure risk before release. ## Guardrails - Do not promise award, volume, exclusivity, or contract terms without authority. - Use approved legal and procurement language rather than inventing binding terms. - Give material clarifications to all eligible bidders through the same controlled channel. ## Done - An issued RFP package contains scope, requirements, response format, timeline, and evaluation method - Review evidence shows mandatory gates and weighted criteria match the approved need - Amendments, bidder questions, and release approval have an auditable record